CCS/CCUS: Locking the Earth’s Carbon, Unlocking Our Future

SCGC Explainer:

• • Reaching net zero requires carbon capture for heavy industry, as renewables alone aren't enough.
  • AI and modular designs are making CCS/CCUS cheaper, faster, and more flexible.
  • To de-risk investment, the industry is shifting to collaborative "hubs" where multiple companies share the high cost of CCS/CCUS infrastructure.
  • Government policies are creating a stable market, driving billions in private investment for the tech.
    

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For decades, the climate challenge was defined by renewables. Now, the frontier has shifted to a more complex problem: the carbon footprint of heavy industry. This new reality is most visibly embodied by ventures like Climeworks' huge Carbon Capture Technology plants in Iceland, but it extends to the entire Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) ecosystem, from circular economy models in Australia to integrated projects in the American Midwest.

This global scramble, therefore, forces a defining question of our era: is Carbon Capture a genuine key to our climate future, or merely a high-risk, multi-trillion-dollar subsidy for the fossil fuel industry? The answer is being forged now, in a global gamble that pits immense financial and political capital against the challenge of re-engineering the very backbone of modern civilization before the clock runs out.

The Arsenal of Technology: How Carbon Capture Works

To understand the push for Net Zero Emissions, it’s crucial to know that Carbon Capture Technology isn’t a single hero. Instead, think of it as a team of specialists, each with a unique and critical role in tackling the 2,500 gigatons of CO₂ humanity has pumped into the atmosphere. With our global carbon budget shrinking to less than 400 gigatons to meet the Paris Agreement's 1.5°C target, deploying this entire team is no longer a choice but a mathematical and economic necessity.

The workhorse of this strategy is Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS), which acts like a bouncer at the door of a nightclub. Its job is to stop trouble before it ever hits the street. Stationed at the source of pollution—a steel mill, a cement plant, or a power station—this technology intercepts carbon dioxide from the flue gas, trapping it through a chemical process before it can escape up the smokestack.  This isn’t a new idea; it’s been in practice for decades, dating back to Norway’s Sleipner offshore plant in 1997. Today, it’s seen as the only viable path to decarbonize heavy industries whose chemical processes, not just their energy use, make them massive emitters. The mission is simple and direct: prevention.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

DEEP DIVE: The Three Methods of Carbon Capture

While the goal is to capture CO₂ at its source, engineers have three primary methods to choose from, each with its own trade-offs in cost and efficiency.

• • • Post-Combustion Capture: This is the most common approach for existing facilities. Think of it as a filter added to the end of the process, which chemically scrubs CO₂ from the exhaust gas after the fuel is burned. Its main advantage is that it can be retrofitted onto current power plants and factories.
    • Pre-Combustion Capture: This method removes the carbon before the fuel is burned. The fuel is first converted into a synthesis gas (syngas), and the CO₂ is separated from it. While often more efficient, it's difficult and costly to retrofit into existing infrastructure.
    • Oxy-Fuel Combustion: This is a more radical redesign. Instead of burning fuel in normal air, it's burned in pure oxygen. This results in an exhaust stream that is almost pure CO₂, making it easy to capture without a chemical separation step. However, this requires a complete rebuild of the combustion system, making it impractical for most existing plants.

After capture, the CO₂ is compressed into a liquid and transported via pipeline or ship to a storage site, where it's injected deep underground into stable geological formations for permanent storage.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

With these foundational methods established, the true story of modern Carbon Capture begins—not just with chemistry, but with computation.

The Game-Changers: AI and Modularity Redefine the Field

The protagonist in the race to Net Zero Emissions is no longer the brute-force industrial process of the past. Today, Carbon Capture Technology has been reborn, its brain supercharged by artificial intelligence. Where scientists once spent years searching for effective materials, AI models now screen millions of chemical compounds in weeks, rapidly identifying optimal "sorbents" that trap CO₂ with unprecedented efficiency. This digital intelligence is embodied in a new physical form: modular engineering. Forget monolithic plants; the new approach uses adaptable, stackable units, like high-tech building blocks, that can be deployed flexibly across diverse geographies and industries, tailored precisely to the scale of the challenge.

The original carbon manager, of course, is nature itself. The world’s forests and oceans—the wise old gardeners—have been absorbing CO₂ for eons. But as the non-profit ClimateWorks Foundation notes, nature is overwhelmed. In response, some efforts now focus on supercharging these natural processes, from mass tree planting to novel techniques like enhanced rock weathering. These methods are crucial, but they are too slow to counter the sheer volume of industrial emissions. They need technological support to stand a chance, creating a unified front where technology assists nature in the monumental task of rebalancing the Earth’s atmosphere.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Case Study: SCGC's Circular Carbon Strategy

At the forefront of the industrial pivot to Carbon Capture Technology in Thailand is SCGC, which is pioneering a multi-faceted strategy to transform carbon from a liability into a valuable asset. Rather than relying on a single solution, the company is building a comprehensive carbon-circular economy. This effort includes high-profile international collaborations, such as with Japan's IHI to convert captured CO₂ directly into key petrochemicals, participating in 2020 European Green Deal to create industrial products, and partnering with Avantium to develop carbon-negative plastic polymers by upcycling CO₂ into PLGA.

By complementing these high-tech initiatives with nature-based solutions like mangrove reforestation, SCGC is creating a powerful, integrated model for how heavy industry can aggressively pursue a low-carbon future. This dual approach—simultaneously investing in cutting-edge technological utilization and proven natural sequestration—demonstrates a holistic commitment that sets a compelling blueprint for the entire industrial sector.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

But this unified front of technology and nature faces a gauntlet of real-world challenges.

The Horizon: A World Betting on Carbon Capture

Despite the immense challenges, a clear and undeniable momentum is building. The global pipeline for Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) projects is swelling, with investments tripling since 2022 to reach $6.4 billion and a project pipeline on track to capture over 430 million metric tons of CO₂ annually by 2030. This surge is driven by a new, collaborative approach. Rather than isolated projects, the industry is coalescing around massive "hubs"—shared infrastructure that lowers the immense Carbon Capture Cost for everyone involved. From Norway’s pioneering Northern Lights project, now planning its third expansion due to high demand, to new multi-billion-dollar commitments in the UK, the Middle East, and Australia, the blueprint for a global carbon management industry is now being drawn in steel and concrete.

This new momentum is being fueled by two powerful catalysts: transformative innovation and supportive policy. Technologically, the field has evolved far beyond simple storage. Companies are now unlocking new capital by turning captured carbon into valuable products—from strengthening concrete to creating sustainable fuels—transforming a liability into an asset. Politically, governments are finally creating the market certainty required for such massive, long-term investments. Robust frameworks like the US 45Q tax credit, which offers up to $180 per ton for direct air capture, and Europe's rising carbon price are de-risking the gamble, creating the stable financial landscape necessary for this technology to scale and contribute to the goal of Net Zero Emissions.

The evidence is now inescapable. Carbon Capture Technology is no longer science fiction. The machines—from vast industrial hubs in Texas to modular units in Iceland—are being built. The ultimate question, therefore, has shifted. It is no longer can we do this, but should we—and who will reap the rewards of this audacious gamble on the Earth's future?

__________________________________________________

Image courtesy and References:

• • https://edition.cnn.com/2024/05/08/climate/direct-air-capture-plant-iceland-climate-intl
  • https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/03/carbon-capture-storage-essentials-uptake/
  • https://carbonherald.com/top-10-carbon-capture-companies/
  • https://www.iea.org/commentaries/ccus-projects-around-the-world-are-reaching-new-milestones
  • https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-64723497
  • https://www.azocleantech.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=2013
  • https://carbongap.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/The-difference-between-CCS-CCU-and-CDR-and-why-it-matters.pdf